There cannot be many of us who do not owe a debt of gratitude to Phil Rushton, both for his theoretical brilliance, allied to an unswerving devotion in most difficult professional circumstances to the cause of unpopular scientific truths, and for his steadfast, loyal European heart.  How much poorer would we all have been had Rushton not possessed these qualities ... had he merely shied away from the race question and lived an ordinary academic’s life, a quiet life, the life of an unquestioning product of his political times.

I did not discover Rushton until early in 2003.  It was at that time when I had decided to contribute something to the cause of white survival.  There was a particular question which troubled me, and which I saw as holding a key to changing the fortunes of white advocacy.  To answer it I needed a crucible, and to get that ... to construct something people would feel worthwhile writing for and reading ... I had to generate some kind of internet presence.

Cue Race, Evolution, and Behaviour.  When I came across it at Rushton’s own Darwin site, it had already been published eight years, and Rushton himself had said that he had run out of opponents to debate.  I certainly hadn’t, though.  I had found what I needed, and promptly devoured it in one sitting, reading in bed until the small hours.  For the next fourteen or fifteen months I blasted around the political blogosphere provoking every liberal, every racial egalitarian, every race-denier, every anti-racist I could into a hopeless battle about human differences and hereditarianism (hopeless courtesy of Rushton’s superb analysis), psychometrics, and gene issues generally.

A surprising number of my opponents knew of Rushton, and had a ready put-down - second- or third-hand of course.  I do not believe that a single one of them escaped the shredder.  REB’s central theory of r/K and child development was just too perfect in its internal fit.  Most of the liberal rif-raff, of course, didn’t know about this “controversial” (meaning courageous) Anglo-Canadian psychology professor, born on the Dorset-Hampshire border a couple of miles from my own birthplace and eight years distant in time.  They would, in any case, have considered their political truths inviolable to attack by one supposed racist using the theories of another.  They never had a chance.  There was metaphorical blood everywhere.

Thanks to the carnage I had something to gesture towards when the moment came, in the summer of 2004, to put together a slate of writers for a website to be titled majorityrights.com.  I never knew Rushton, and only corresponded with him very briefly.  I wish now I had had the opportunity to explain how much I extracted from his thesis and to what purpose I had put it.  He would probably have wanted to know, like most scientists, if I had correctly and faithfully represented his thought.  The answer was that REB was so beautifully and clearly written, that was an easy task.

There is not another Phil Rushton in this world.  White Nationalism has lost a true champion.  He did not live nearly long enough - gone at just 68.  But for his life and his talents and his work we equally loyal-hearted sons and daughters of old Europe can be extraordinarily grateful.  I know I am.

Something is stirring in France, and its name is Génération Identitaire:

READ MORE...

Hate is the emotion of powerless resistance.

Hate becomes a crime during the last stages of consolidating tyranny.

Since the BNP demise thread transmogrified into a thread warfare thread, I thought it might be helpful to augment previous advice on comment style and content with a few practical tips on staying alive in the thread war.

Choosing your battleground

Different media have widely differing accessibilities for nationalists and tolerances for nationalist opinion.  We are, though, engaged in a war for control of the discourse, and that means finding the level of truth-speaking at which it is possible to participate.

Pre-moderated media, such as the Daily Mail and the BBC, tend not only to exclude the possibility of an exchange of opinion, but weed out radically pro-white comment.  These media have, in my view, to be addressed later, if and when the general discourse has been liberalised.  The place to start is post-moderated sites on the political right, where the tenor of comment provides more cover.  Post-moderated sites on the left, like CiF, New Statesman, and The Independent are good places to conduct raids but are not relevant to the campaign as such (though they have utility when the left is in power).

The Daily Telegraph is clear favourite among the dailies in Britain.  It has the advantage of separate DISQUS systems for the general comment and news system and for the blog system, so a user-name ban in one does not imply a user-name ban in the other (a full IP ban does, though).

READ MORE...

... discussed at the British Democracy Forum in a post titled somewhat more speculatively than it would seem, “Message to Nick Griffin’s Special Branch handlers”.

Bear in mind the that German government court papers of a year or two back indicated that out of 200 leading NPD functionaries, 30 were working as undercover agents.

The interesting part of the conversation begins with a response to another BDF member who had observed that, “There is a great willingness - indeed, an enthusiasm - to believe that Griffin is “state” or an “agent”. To do so allows one to exculpate the mind. It is a nonsense. Griffin is nothing more nor less than a failed would-be businessman with a penchant for dubious practice, like most pyramid salesmen.”

Mike: Fair point for general membership but others knew well what was going on and blanked it from their minds for convenience. The ords look at the tops and say well they are still there so the rumours must be false. The tops are guilty parties.

It’s the same with state plants. They can scream to high heaven ‘I’m a plant’ and people blank it as something which only happens in books - like bank runs. There is one at the moment outside the BNP who screams it. As someone said to me of followers ‘They’ve been told and it goes over their heads’. Now you can never be 100% sure so the correct thing is to be wary of what they are up to and where it might lead not ignore it.

View the operations of Mark Kennedy elsewhere. Appears from nowhere and very helpful plus provides facilities. People like that you keep an eye on. If they are plants they’ll let it slip somehow. It’s only human. Look out for sabotage or luring you into situations which can be used against you but not necessarily involving anything illegal. And keep in mind that the state is obsessed with building databases of ‘enemies of society’. MI5 had files on FOUR MILLION people some years ago. Even they admitted this was a little excessive. A lot of these plants are name and address collectors. Anyone opposing state policy - even writing to a newspaper - is an ‘enemy of society’.

I think these guys must be soft minded. They’ll be dumped as soon as not useful. It’s not worth it.

Mill: The problem is that such a large proportion of prominent nationalists have been labelled “State Plants” at some time or other, that it becomes difficult to separate the fiction from the reality.

READ MORE...

Dear Nikolaos Michaloliakos,

The Golden Dawn can establish a shadow government by creating a new Drachma, issued monthly in a citizen’s dividend, equally to all legitimate citizens, where citizenry is determined by patriotic means.  In exchange, all citizens are expected to participate in the enforcement of the shadow government’s laws and to come to its defense.

This automatically excludes immigrants and other unpatriotic residents of Greece from the delivery of social goods.

If shadow taxation is based on liquid value of only those assets recognized as legitimate by the shadow government, the new Drachma monetary base can be controlled at the same time that the shadow economy utilizing the new Drachma is grown.

Such a system would unify taxation, delivery of social goods and regulation of the monetary base with minimum government management involvement and maximum transparency, hence minimum corruption.  Since the delivery of social goods is in the form of a monthly cash stream, rather than “needs testing”, the typical problems of managing a welfare state are avoided and free enterprise will operate in service of the citizenry.

Please consider doing this, not just for Greece, but to provide us with an example of how patriotic government can be practical and serve the people.

Sincerely,

James Bowery

PS: Some details on the operation of the shadow economy follow:

If the liquid value of an asset is the highest Drachma bid placed in escrow, the monetary base can be the present liquid value of the shadow economy.  This is made practical by using an electronic exchange such as Cyclos (or other appropriate substitute developed by the GD).  Such an electronic exchange can use debit cards issued by the shadow government, but more importantly, all Drachmas currently in circulation can be automatically transferred from one escrowed bid to another escrowed bid as part of each transaction.  Deciding which escrowed bid to withdraw for use as the Drachmas for a transaction, and which escrowed bid is to be placed as the recipient of those same Drachma’s, would be the job of the shadow banks acting on behalf of depositors.  The banks would be paid interest on their escrowed bids by the shadow government only for those bids that were the highest for a given asset.  In general, the interest paid on eligible escrowed bids would equal the interest rate paid by the shadow government to borrow money over the short term.

Financial instruments, such as mortgages, would have bids placed in escrow for them just as any other asset.  Therefore, bids for assets that may have debts against them, such as homes, would be net rather than gross value—which is a feature of asset liquidation.  For instance, if a home owner has an “underwater mortgage”, it may be the case that during liquidation, the owner would have to pay money rather than receiving money.  The holder of the mortgage, however, would continue to receive mortgage payments and could sell the mortgage on the open market for the present value of its likely future payment stream.

Listen to “The Pagan Bible”, now at Majority Radio.

White mating is the challenge. 

By white mating I do not merely mean getting people with white skin to form families and raise children successfully (whatever “success” can mean in a society such as the one in which we live).  I mean stopping if not reversing the dysgenic breeding that has been imposed on whites and doing so sustainably for at least some portion of the white population.

I’m not going to ask you to accept my definition of “whiteness”.  I’m not going to ask you to accept my proposed definition of “dysgenic”.  Therefore, I’m not going to ask you to accept my proposed answer to the challenge of white mating.

Define these and suggest an answer yourself if you don’t like my definitions and answer.

Below the fold, are my definitions and answer.  Add to that answer or do better.

READ MORE...